huh

Main Menu

Latest Comments

Comments

Crayfish issue not as bad as Canada.

Yes. Absolutely. What you said.

There is no debate here when people argue from false premises

Popular All Time

Search this site

Daily Mail Related Links

Fun Links

Writers / Thinkers

Tags

amanda platell daily mail liz jones melanie philips peter hitchens richard littlejohn about advertiser affair again anger angry another asylum attack barack being best blame body boob boyle brain brigade britain british broken campaign candidate cant cause change character children column comment compassion consequence conservative continue criminal dacre daily dale dead death defend deserve despair destroy difference different disabled disaster dont editor elf 'n' safety even ever evidence face facebook favour fear freak free friday from fury georgina gervai going gone good griffin hate hatred have having headline health hitchen holiday homophobia hypocrisy iain idea ignoring immigrant immigration intolerance irony jone journalism journalism just kill killer killing liberal like link littlejohn love mail make marriage media mistake moir more muslim mythical nazi nick obama outcome outrage over part paul peter place please police poll pres racism racist rape real really report reveal richard ricky right safety same scare shit shock show slack some spot statistic stop story strike support susan swine tabloid tabloid take talk terrible terror than that they think thinking through today torture trigger utter very victorian want week white will with without work world worse wrong year your yourself

Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

View blog authority

Notice

Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

--
yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"

huh

Wednesday, 17 March 2010 22:37

well, all (all, and indeed all) of that aside, i still trust peer review, you have to have a system to filter information, otherwise there is just too much of it, and the peer review system is a good solution, it actually prevents the bias you have a problem with. as for the "contraversy" just because there is a debate happening doesn't make every side of it equally valid. the rise of blogs and the internet has lead to people questioning a whole bunch of stuff, even things that are downright insane, people debating it doesn't mean there is actually a valid question to be argued, people are just like that.

This is a comment on "The New Vaccination and Autism Scare: Same Shit, Different Species"

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday