If you keep your mind sufficiently open, people will throw a lot of rubbish into it.
William A Orton

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday


Search this site


Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

http://www.wikio.co.uk

Notice
  • Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

    --
    yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"
Leo McKinstry: A Challenge PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Tuesday, 20 April 2010 08:56

Leo McKinstry today makes the following assertions:

The great myth of the pro-immigration lobby is to pretend that newcomers have been the engine of economic prosperity. True, many have made a wonderful contribution to this country.

But the fact is that any economic gains have been outweighed by the colossal costs to the public sector in housing, education, healthcare and social security. As a host of authoritative studies shows, migrants are more likely to be in receipt of benefits than the British-born population.

It is one of the reasons why our public finances have sunk into massive deficits during a period of unprecedented immigration...

He provides no evidence for any of these assertions. No link or naming of his 'authorative studies', no reports demonstrating that migrants take more from the state than they pay in taxes. No evidence, just lazy racist stereotyping ready to be lapped up by other lazy racists. Expect the BNP to be using this article as yet more 'evidence' of the terrible 'truth' about immigration.

A cursory Google search leads you to evidence that suggests the reason Leo McKinstry hasn't provided any evidence (apart from the obvious excuse that as a tabloid hack, he simply never has to) is because he is just making it up. For example, Camden council's immigrant myths and fact section contains the following:

Migrants contribute 10 per cent more in taxes than they consume in benefits and public services. Migrants contributed £2.5 billion more to the state than they received in benefits and state services, according to the Home Office’s own figures.

Quite how this net contribution has helped 'sink' the public finances is beyond me.

Leo McKinstry will in all likelihood never read this blog post. But if he does, I challenge him to provide any credible evidence to back up his claims.

That such an utterly baseless, untrue article can be published solely to incite racial hatred, intolerance and the rise of fascism in the UK says everyone you need to know about the effectiveness of the Press Complaints Commission.

That immigration has become one of the key battlegrounds over which the election is being fought should be to the eternal shame of the tabloid media. But we all know, they have no shame.

 
Comments (2)
2 Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:44
It would be easy to turn this on its head and write from say a Spanish perspective about the British white settlers who have blighted the Spanish coast and who have re-created little bits of Worthing in Spain.
1 Tuesday, 20 April 2010 11:27
He says it's all true because he says so. No amount of evidence to the contrary will convince him - or rather his readers - otherwise. Chances are he actually knows it's all rubbish but it really suits the paper's agenda to put out these lies. I've occasionally put people straight when they've stated obvious nonsense and have been told 'well is that really right or are they just making it up'. So there you have it. The truth is what you believe, not what is.

Add your comment

Your name:
Your website:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack