|
Written by Uponnothing
|
|
Monday, 06 April 2009 20:58 |
|
The Mail enjoys printing pictures of Suri Cruise, Mailwatch even dedicated a thread to it thanks to the shear volume of Mail articles about her. Now, however, the Mail has the temerity to accuse others - namely the fashion world - of condemning Suri Cruise to 'a lifetime of being analysed'. How thoughtful of them to be so concerned about her, after all, it wasn't long ago that they were already calling Suri a 'fashionista', or pointing out her 'flashy red nails', or pointing out her 'ladybird-style umbrella'.
Luckily they also pointed out that: 'A happy Suri waved, smiled, and laughed with photographers, showing she's clearly unnverved1 by their constant presence'.
Phew, at least they don't have to feel guilty about exploiting a child then. I also assume the Mail won't possibly analyse or judge someone based on what they wear or their appearance would they?
1 - Another triumph for Mail editors.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 28 August 2009 12:34 |