The secret of successful journalism is to make your readers so angry they will write half your paper for you.
C.E.M. Joad

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday


Search this site


Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

http://www.wikio.co.uk

Notice
  • Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

    --
    yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"
Pick the face that fits PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 20:40

There are two very unsavoury rape stories currently on the Daily Mail website. The first story is this: 'Boy, 13, who raped woman in front of his friends is jailed for just three years... because he said 'sorry'". The second story is this: 'First picture of teenager who sexually assaulted girl, 9, while on bail for raping 10-year-old'.

Clearly, both stories are horrific and you would expect the Daily Mail to cover them and for readers to assume that this is more evidence of New Labour's Broken Britain. You would also assume that both stories would have equal news value, although one story deals with a very young perpetrator, the other deals with the equally shocking aspect of the terribly young ages of the victims. However, one story makes the lead story of the Mail website, whilst the other story only makes a mention over half-way down the page - half the size and below the story: 'Living in Laa-Laa land? Man United star Gary Neville unveils plans for £8m 'Teletubby' eco-bunker built into a hillside'.

I think this can be explained when you realise that both of these awful stories are accompanied by a photograph of the perpetrators:

top_story

not_as_important

Naturally the white faced rapist is the one who doesn't make it halfway up the Daily Mail website - ironically he is placed next to another white faced sex offender. The brown faced rapist makes the lead story.

 
Comments (2)
2 Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:18
What a ridiculous post. Yes we know the Daily Mail is racist. Surprise surprise. Would you have been happier if the article of the white rapist was on the front page and the muslim story further down under the Gary Neville story? What your doing here is worrying about the fact that a story of a muslim rapist is given more national coverage than a white rapist. What an idiot you are using two rape cases for your own agenda.

The fact that he got 3 years for saying sorry should surely show up what a ridiculous country we live in. Maybe something about him being the youngest convicted rapist has something to do with it too. They are both scumbags. Get over yourself you liberal loony! Also stop reading the Mail if it makes you that angry.
1 Monday, 01 February 2010 12:58
Not surprisingly, the number of comments also show the amount of interest in the respective cases.
I saw the photo of the 15-year old in Metro. I was surprised - I thought that there were rules about not identifying convicted (or accused) children?

Add your comment

Your name:
Your website:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack