I am unable to understand how a man of honor could take a newspaper in his hands without a shudder of disgust.
Charles Baudelaire

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday


Search this site


Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

http://www.wikio.co.uk

Notice
  • Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

    --
    yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"
A new low for the Daily Mail? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Wednesday, 07 April 2010 14:39

Found this interesting comment over on Tabloidwatch's blog and have copied and pasted it here to demonstrate just how low the Daily Mail stoop to bash the BBC. No further comment is needed:

...there was a classic piece of Mail-ese Beeb bashing today...

The front page includes a picture of the new Doctor Who girl, Karen Gillan, and the headline:

'Doctor Who's new girl 'too sexy'.

The article inside has quotes from fans on messageboards. Well, two, to be precise.

One is:

"'They've completely demeaned Doctor Who by replacing good episode stories with slutty girls.' "

So I googled it...

It brings up this:

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question...3133602AALDZTh

Scroll down, 'un-hide' a comment at the bottom and you find:

"They've completely demeaned Doctor Who by replacing good episode stories with slutty girls. Ew, I hope Karen Gillan gets killed off, ugly mother fhucker."

Nice, eh? Wonder why they missed out the second part.

The other quote they used...

"'Why did she dress up as a tarty policewoman? Surely that's not fitting for a family show.' "

Well check out this post from DigitalSpy, dated 17/12/09.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...32&postcount=1

"Amy Pond - Do we know why she's dressed as a tarty policwoman??


Any Idea?

I'm guessing she's not an actual policewoman??

I did think strippogram but surely thats not fitting for a family show...

so, any ideas?? "

In the bigger scheme of things, it's probably not that important.

But it highlights their quality journalism and exhaustive research.

 
Renaming the British Channel PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Monday, 05 April 2010 15:51

The Daily Mail are covering the 'news' that the barmy EU are renaming and downgrading the 'British Channel' and GUESS WHO'S PAYING:

the mighty English Channel's status could be reduced to that of a mere creek if Brussels has its way.

Officials want to rename it 'the Anglo-French Pond' as part of a plan to bolster the notion of an EU superstate.

More than £1million, much of it coming from the British taxpayer, is being spent drawing up a new map to be distributed to schools and bureaucrats.

It defies centuries of history by wiping out current national borders to foster 'cultural identification' between regions and encourage greater integration.

Of course, the whole story is absolute bullshit and pretty silly, even by Daily Mail standards. For starters it seems to assume that every country in Europe currently refers to the stretch of water as the 'British Channel', which they don't. However, that aside, what is really pathetic is the Mail seriously suggesting that the story has any merit. This 'map' has existed in some form since 2006 and at that point the Telegraph published the following:

Andrew Duff, the Liberal Democrat MEP for the East of England, described the Conservative reaction to the directive and the creation of transnational regions as "childish baloney. This directive is trying to achieve a norm of statistics across Europe to develop social policy, transport infrastructure and so on," he said. "It is just a tool for policy-making."

Not surprisingly the article has already attracted over 528 comments from the utterly stupid people that take this kind of Euro-sceptic nonsense seriously. I wonder if the accompanying picture of a Spitfire flying past the White Cliffs is Polish again...

 
You can't even show the rugby anymore PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:20

Barely a day seems to pass without the Daily Mail launching a pathetic attack on the BBC. Each time it is a tale of 'fury' and 'outrage' as the BBC caters for a diverse audience of over 60 million people. Today it was the rugby and sport that caused 'fury': 'Fury at BBC's 13-hour Saturday sportathon: Bar the Lottery and the news, nothing on except rugby and football'. So, a good weekend for people who like rugby, and I'm not sure if it has passed the Daily Mail by, but a lot of people like watching Six Nations rugby.

But, of course, there are people in this world who just like to bitch and moan about every little thing because their lives are so meaningless. They buy the Daily Mail every day so they can be freshly outraged over PC councils, wheelie bins and 'yuman rites' and worse, they inhabit inane Internet forums where they piss and moan about what is or isn't on TV:

Last night, angry licence fee-payers complained on message boards about popular drama and entertainment shows such as Casualty being booted off the flagship channel.

Some called the schedule a ‘total disgrace’ and a ‘waste of money’, demanding the resignation of BBC director-general Mark Thompson and BBC1 controller Jay Hunt, while others said that if the BBC wanted to provide such blanket coverage, it should launch its own sports channel.

A day in which some sport is shown causes these utter morons to call for the resignation of the director-general, get a fucking grip. If you don't like what's on the BBC, turn over the channel, or better still, switch off the TV and to to engage in a more worthwhile activity. Don't complain that Casualty (a weekly show that has been on for as long as I can remember, and one that has spawned the weekly hour-long sister show 'Holby City') has been given a rest for a week. You get Casualty all year round, twice a week if you count Holby City, the Six Nations rugby happens just once a year you miserable arseholes.

The Daily Mail and these whinging fucking simpletons need to just grow up and accept that the BBC caters for a wide audience. Surprisingly there are a lot of licence fee payers who got rather bored of casualty years ago, given the standard plot which seems to go:

  • Oh look, not seen this character before
  • I do hope they're careful with the threshing machine they're fixing
  • Horrific accident
  • Casualty

Forgive me if I don't watch Casualty or find it interesting, but you know what, I won't demand that it is taken off-air just because I don't like it. That would make me a self-absorbed bell-end with nothing better to do than try to share my own sense of misery with others.

If you were one of the people throwing your toys out of the pram on the message boards over the BBC on Saturday I'd advise you to try and grow up. Perhaps start by taking a long hard look in the mirror and ask yourself - seriously - if you really have nothing else good in your life apart from a TV soap. As for the Daily Mail, really, is this the best attack you can level at the BBC?

 
Georgina Littlejohn is worse than Richard Littlejohn PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Thursday, 11 February 2010 21:48

If you've read anything by Richard Littlejohn you've probably asked yourself: 'Can writing get any worse than this?'. It can, much worse. Imagine, for example, that Richard Littlejohn had managed to get a woman into bed and actually have sexual relations with that woman - I know, it is a foul image but bear with me. Imagine if that woman then gave birth to a child who grew up and started to write for the Daily Mail. Scary, and, as it turns out: true.

Tabloid Watch has already covered one of Georgina Littlejohn's utterly pointless traffic generating stories, but shamefully I have missed this absolute gem posted on the Mail website on the 4th January: 'Gerard Butler packs some paunch on his Barbados holiday as his Spartan muscles become a distant memory'.

Essentially it is just your typical Daily Mail story: person gets slightly bigger than they were, ugh, how disgusting they must get down the gym:

Only three years ago he was the hunky Spartan whose rippling torso caused an excitable frenzy among millions of women.

But Gerard Butler appears to have succumbed to the calorific excesses of the Christmas period and alarmingly piled on the pounds.

However, it is much worse than that, for although the article makes no mention of this, it is clearly stated underneath a picture that: 'Gone to pot belly: Long gone is the taut - admittedly computer enhanced six-pack - instead the actor's once fit physique has softened considerably' (emphasis is mine).

So, Georgina Littlejohn has made an entire article out of someone appearing less toned than they did when they were digitally enhanced in a Hollywood film. And you really thought Richard Littlejohn could drag out bullshit for a paycheque like a true pro.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 5
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack