If one morning I walked on top of the water across the Potomac River, the headline that afternoon would read: "President Can't Swim."
Lyndon B. Johnson

ANGRY MOB

We read the papers everyday


Search this site


Your Ad Here

Stats since 7/04/09

http://www.wikio.co.uk

Notice
  • Guest user account is not properly configured. Please set 'Username of Guest' option to the Username of registered user. guest_username="guest"

    --
    yvComment solution, version="1.24.0"
NOW FACEBOOK nearly DESTROYS MARRIAGE PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uponnothing   
Thursday, 25 June 2009 16:45

It seems that hardly a week goes by without the Daily Mail pointing out the evils of social networking - apart from Myspace, not sure why the Daily Mail refuses to attack the Murdoch-owned social networking site. Today is another warning of the 'horrors' of using Facebook as a loving, middle-class married couple are almost torn asunder by the evil social networking site. Previously Facebook has put a husband in a coma and has also been singled out for causing cancer; so today's story is just another example of how Facebook is definitely out to ruin your life.

Today's article: 'How Facebook nearly destroyed our marriage' manages to plumb new depths of utter stupidity. Essentially the whole story can be summarised thus: a married couple create a page, allow open access (anyone can view it) they put up wedding / honeymoon photos up etc and one day a spam message was left saying that the husband (Gary) had given the spammer chlamydia and that Gary must therefore also have it. Wife is obviously stupid, doesn't trust her husband and has a big crisis.

Yet the Daily Mail suggests that this is not an example of people being too stupid to use the Internet, but another case of people 'fall[ing] foul of Facebook'. Furthermore they suggest that:

 

The most worrying fact is that despite an increasing number of horror stories, social networking sites are more popular than ever.

 

So this example of people being unaware of spam is actually another 'horror' perpetrated by Facebook. The thing the Daily Mail seems to brazenly overlook is that the online community is like any other: it has its fair share of shits. For example, if you visit the Daily Mail website you will see no-end of ignorant, hateful and racist comments plastered over the site, yet (as the Daily Mail points out next to them) these are the thoughts of the commentator, not the newspaper and therefore the Daily Mail takes no responsibility for them (even though they are moderated). However, when someone joins Facebook with the sole purpose of spamming people with the kind of message above, then Facebook is the evil force, not the user.

Regarding the stupidity of the wife being so quick to fall for the hoax (and basically take the word of a stranger over the word of her husband) a poster over at Mailwatch has pointed out:

I wouldn't worry about it too much; that couple got an email yesterday telling them they've won the Moroccan National Lottery. Jane said:

"Once I've simply popped in my name, address, bank details and my mother's PIN code, we'll be the dog's richest bollocks."


 
Comments (2)
2 Thursday, 02 July 2009 18:55
Its also amusing how the tabloids have an almost instinctive hatred of any new technology. I remember back in the 80s when newspapers were full of stories about kids nicking thousands of quid to feed their space-invaders addiction, teenagers becoming satan worshippers after playing Dungeons & Dragons and overall bemusement at the idea of young lads spending time on those darn computer things. We also saw articles about Walkmen making everyone deaf and how it was a small step from going to amusement arcades to becoming a drug-addled dosser in the gutter. I wonder what technology the press will hate in 2020?
1 Thursday, 02 July 2009 18:37
The Mail's Facebook obsession is very tedious, but there's a few reasons for it; They probably constantly headline Facebook to bump their stories up on search engines (having your headline reference one of the most popular websites may improve your ranking). Then there's the dozens of anti-Daily Mail Facebook groups that exist. And finally, the Mail owns a share in ITN and if I recall ITV bought Friends Reunited for a horrific sum (>£100 million) hoping to make a packet. Then Facebook came along and overshadowed it, probably forever. There's definitely legitimate issues with social networking sites (i.e. sticking personal info up on the Internet is always risky), but the Mail clearly isn't looking at these - otherwise it'd have to criticise all the other sites as well. We'll probably be waiting for the "Bebo made my Missus run away with a Priest" headline for some time.

Add your comment

Your name:
Your website:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack